《哲学史-philosophy of history(英文版)》philosophy of history(英文版)-第22章
distinction which the reflective understanding makes between an idea and the corresponding reality; holding to an abstract and consequently untrue idea; not grasping it in its pleteness; or … which is virtually; though not in point of form; the same … not taking a concrete view of a people and a state。 We shall have to show further on that the constitution adopted by a people makes one substance … one spirit … with its religion; its art and philosophy; or; at least; with its conceptions and thoughts … its culture generally; not to expatiate upon the additional influences; ab extra; of climate; of neighbours; of its place in the world。 A State is an individual totality; of which you cannot select any particular side; although a supremely important one; such as its political constitution; and deliberate and decide respecting it in that isolated form。 Not only is that constitution most intimately connected with and dependent on those other spiritual forces; but the form of the entire moral and intellectual individuality … prising all the forces it embodies … is only a step in the development of the grand Whole; … with its place pre…appointed in the process: a fact which gives the highest sanction to the constitution in question; and establishes its absolute necessity。 …The origin of a State involves imperious lordship on the one hand; instinctive submission on the other。 But even obedience … lordly power; and the fear inspired by a ruler … in itself implies some degree of voluntary connection。 Even in barbarous states this is the case; it is not the isolated will of individuals that prevails; individual pretensions are relinquished; and the general will is the essential bond of political union。 This unity of the general and the particular is the Idea itself; manifesting itself as a State; and which subsequently undergoes further development within itself。 The abstract yet necessitated process in the development of truly independent states is as follows: … They begin with regal power; whether of patriarchal or military origin。 In the next phase; particularity and individuality assert themselves in the form of Aristocracy and Democracy。 Lastly; we have the subjection of these separate interests to a single power; but which can be absolutely none other than one outside of which those spheres have an independent position; viz。; the Monarchical。 Two phases of royalty; therefore; must be distinguished; … a primary and a secondary one。 This process is necessitated; so that the form of government assigned to a particular stage of development must present itself: it is therefore no matter of choice; but is that form which is adapted to the spirit of the people。 § 48 In a Constitution the main feature of interest is the self…development of the rational; that is; the political condition of a people; the setting free of the successive elements of the Idea: so that the several powers in the State manifest themselves as separate; … attain their appropriate and special perfection; … and yet in this independent condition; work together for one object; and are held together by it … i。e。; form an organic whole。 The State is thus the embodiment of rational freedom; realising and recognising itself in an objective form。 For its objectivity consists in this; … that its successive stages are not merely ideal; but are present in an appropriate reality; and that in their separate and several working; they are absolutely merged in that agency by which the totality … the soul … the individual unity … is produced; and of which it is the result。 § 49 The State is the Idea of Spirit in the external manifestation of human Will and its Freedom。 It is to the State; therefore; that change in the aspect of History indissolubly attaches itself; and the successive phases of the Idea manifest themselves in it as distinct political principles。 The Constitutions under which World…Historical peoples have reached their culmination; are peculiar to them; and therefore do not present a generally applicable political basis。 Were it otherwise; the differences of similar constitutions would consist only in a peculiar method of expanding and developing that generic basis; whereas they really originate in diversity of principle。 From the parison therefore of the political institutions of the ancient World…Historical peoples; it so happens; that for the most recent principle of a Constitution … for the principle of our own times … nothing (so to speak) can be learned。 In science and art it is quite otherwise; e。 g。; the ancient philosophy is so decidedly the basis of the modern; that it is inevitably contained in the latter; and constitutes its basis。 In this case the relation is that of a continuous development of the same structure; whose foundation…stone; walls; and roof have remained what they were。 In Art; the Greek itself; in its original form; furnishes us the best models。 But in regard to political constitution; it is quite otherwise: here the Ancient and the Modern have not their essential principle in mon。 Abstract definitions and dogmas respecting just government; … importing that intelligence and virtue ought to bear sway … are; indeed; mon to both。 But nothing is so absurd as to look to Greeks; Romans; or Orientals; for models for the political arrangements of our time。 From the East may be derived beautiful pictures of a patriarchal condition; of paternal government; and of devotion to it on the part of peoples; from Greeks and Romans; descriptions of popular liberty。 Among the latter we find the idea of a Free Constitution admitting all the citizens to a share in deliberations and resolves respecting the affairs and laws of the monwealth。 In our times; too; this is its general acceptation; only with this modification; that … since our States are so large; and there are so many of 〃the Many;〃 the latter; … direct action being impossible; … should by the indirect method of elective substitution express their concurrence with resolves affecting the mon weal; that is; that for legislative purposes generally; the people shou